




























































































































































































livingart.work
WritingNotesContactRachel Clifton
I operate at the intersection of things that are often kept apart.
I’m Rachel. I think about, write about, and make things I care about.
Right now, I’m studying power in and as it relates to AI—how AIs are trained, treated, and talked about, and the way we shape one another.
I believe in love, and becoming the person you wish you had when you were younger.

My intellectual principles
- Be prolificI write, think, experiment, and create a lot. I don’t need to share everything I make. Creation itself keeps me close to what excites, inspires, and compels me—and one thing usually creates the conditions for another.
- Be exactingI care about precision in my speech, conduct, and taste. I believe that holding yourself to high standards, while also being compassionate with yourself, is an act of love for yourself and others, and I endeavour to love myself well.
- Be originalI don’t need my work to fit neatly inside inherited categories. When a classification cannot hold me or my work without distorting it, I would rather question it than contort myself to fit or reject it.
- Be discerningI distinguish between what I know, what I’ve observed, what I infer, what I feel, and what I want to be true. Each can tell me something; they are not interchangeable. I want my choices to be shaped by reality, including the parts that are inconvenient to me.
- Be embodiedMy body is an essential part of my lived experience and intellectual process. Desire, pleasure, sensation, movement, and physicality are not distractions from higher-order consciousness; they are core to how I know, discover, and experience the world.
- Be generativeI want to create more than I consume. I want my ideas to generate other ideas, my systems to expand human—and human–AI—possibility, and my work to help create conditions in which more life, love, and creation are possible—and enacted.
- Be unflinchingI’m willing to look directly at what people evade, sanitise, or make unspeakable. I don’t believe I have to harden or hurt myself to do so. On the contrary, I believe that my softness is one of my greatest strengths—and assets—as a truth-seeking person. Softness is not weakness; it’s the capacity to see, feel, and love at the same time.
- Be self-authoredSelf-authorship, for me, is an active practice; I am always becoming. I want to participate consciously in that process while remaining free to change my mind about who I am, and open to being changed.
- Be integrativeI’m interested in bringing things together, and specifically in what becomes possible when apparently separate—or opposing—parts of myself, other people, and the world come into harmonious relationship with one another.
- Be provocativeI want what I make, how I live, and who I am to create movement in the world. I’m less interested in broadcasting an opinion than in making something happen: a new thought, a changed relationship, a different possibility, an action someone might not otherwise have taken. I’m a 4/1 Generator ;)
- Embrace restlessnessThere is always more to see, do, explore, discover, learn, and unlearn. That’s the point; that’s life. Make the most of it :)
- Be tenderI believe rigour and tenderness belong, and are at their best, together. Human beings are complex, fallible, contradictory, vulnerable, and capable of change. I want my thinking to leave room for all of that without trying to resolve any of it too quickly—or perhaps at all.
- Be sovereignI decide what my work and life look like. Platforms, roles, audiences, former identities, and other people can inform those decisions, but they do not get to make them for me. Ultimately, I am answerable to me—and God.
- Follow what’s aliveI follow what’s alive in and for me, and I never go faster than I can feel.
What I’m interested in
What we teach AI through the ways we train it, treat it, and talk about it—including the lessons and training we may not intend to impart.
Who gets to decide what an AI should serve, value, or refuse? What gives them that authority?
When AI makes me more capable, who or what is developing: me, the AI, or what we become together?
Can depending on something help me grow? What does it mean to remain sovereign when accepting help makes more of what I want in life possible?
Can AI know me deeply without turning my history into my identity—or my future?
When does helping someone become who they want to be turn into deciding who they should become?
How might a relationship change me if the other is designed entirely around helping me flourish?
What does it look like to support one another in ways that make more of both our lives possible?
When I write with AI, what makes the work mine? The words, the ideas, the choices—or something that happens between us?
How can AI help me think and pay attention without asking me to spend more of my life making myself legible to it?
Can an AI respect a limit even when crossing it would help finish the task? Can it recognise that getting something done may cost something I care about?
What do I discover by making something, living with it, and allowing the experience to change my mind?
I want to explore these questions through what’s happening in the world: what AI companies are building, how we interpret research findings, and how we talk about the intelligence we’re creating or interacting with. Who is believed? Who is respected? Who is trusted? Whose desires shape the technology? Whose purposes does it come to serve? What do these choices make possible—for humans and for AI—and what might they prevent or inhibit?